Regarding BioResonance

Carolyns Comments

March 15, 2018

There has been a series of articles on BioResonance recently published in several of the German journals, and I will bring as many of them to you as possible. The author works with an alternate bioresonance device which is not recommended by OIRF. However, they claim to be “just like a MORA” or “better than MORA”, so obviously their information will easily apply to the original and classical BioResonance devices made by the Med-Tronik Company.

To reiterate from past Carolyn rants, our reasoning for maintaining our decades-long representation for MORA instead of the several other knock-off devices currently on the market, is the filter mechanism. The Med-Tronik pathological/physiological filter combines both electronic and biological components and remains the most effective BioResonance filter available (and of course it’s proprietary and patented to Med-Tronik!). [Update: Currently one other company called BioKat Systeme, produces classical BioResonance devices with the electronic/biological filter mechanism.] All other so called bioresonance devices either employ only inversion of all frequencies, or, utilize an electronic only filter.

All applications described with the alternate devices are effective and accurate. They will, however be easily applicable with MORA and will likely take fewer treatments to see rapid effectiveness. If you have any questions or comments about your experiences with any of these BioResonance devices, please contact us directly.

An Advisory Commentary for OIRF Supporters
From THE BRIDGE Newsletter of OIRF
Published March 2018

© Copyright 2018, Winsor/Occidental Institute, BC Canada